Your location:Home > NEWS > Shengzhou dynamics
Shengzhou dynamics

Decision on reply to the rejection of "Jiashen" Trademark No. 60155586

AddTime:2022-07-04 11:32:26   Views:     【 Big Mid Small 】   Print   Close

 About the trademark "Jiashen" No. 60155586

 
Refutation reply review decision
 
Shang Ping Zi [2022] No. 0000192486
 
Applicant: Changzhou Jiasheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. (original name: Changzhou Jiasheng non woven fabricLimited company)
Entrusted agent: Beijing Shengzhou International Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd
The applicant's note to our bureau's rejection of its trademark No. 60155586 "Jiashen" (hereinafter referred to as the applied trademark)
If you are not satisfied with the application, you should apply to our bureau for reexamination. Our bureau accepted the case and the trial has been concluded.
The main reasons for the applicant's reexamination: the applied trademark was originally created by the applicant, which was quoted in the rejection decision
No. 14231845 "GIS JS" trademark (hereinafter referred to as the cited trademark) does not constitute the use in the same or similar category
Similar trademarks on commodities. The applicant requests the preliminary examination and approval of the applied trademark.
After reexamination, it is believed that there are differences between the applied trademark and the cited trademark in terms of text composition, call, etc,
Does not constitute a similar trademark used on the same or similar goods.
In accordance with Article 28 of the Trademark Law of the people's Republic of China, our bureau decides as follows:
The application for trademark registration on the re examined goods shall be preliminarily examined and approved.
 
 
 
1/2 members of the collegiate group: Sun Zhiquan
 
Lei Lei
 
Zhang Jing
 
June 27, 2022
 
2/2

Prev:In-depth study of the spirit of General Secretary Xi Jinping's important speech and make concerted efforts to form a strong joint force against malicious registration  Next:What are the conditions for granting a patent right for a design?
Back To Top